GeForce Go 7900 SE vs Radeon R9 370 1024SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTrinidadG73
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 June 2015 (10 years ago)18 April 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed925 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate62.404.200
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs6412
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s21.31 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 June 2015 18 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 20 Watt

R9 370 1024SP has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Go 7900 SE, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 370 1024SP and GeForce Go 7900 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 370 1024SP is a desktop graphics card while GeForce Go 7900 SE is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP
Radeon R9 370 1024SP
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 SE
GeForce Go 7900 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 301 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 370 1024SP or GeForce Go 7900 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.