GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 295X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking302not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.06no data
Power efficiency3.19no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameVesuviusGT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)15 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816 ×2240
Core clock speedno data648 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt204 Watt
Texture fill rate179.2 ×251.84
Floating-point processing power5.733 TFLOPS ×20.7085 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×232
TMUs176 ×280
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length307 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×21 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2512 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s ×2159.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 15 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 204 Watt

R9 295X2 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 285 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 145.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 295X2 and GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 99 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 295X2 or GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.