GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 295X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking301not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.22no data
Power efficiency3.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVesuviusG84
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)5 October 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816 ×232
Core clock speedno data470 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate179.2 ×27.520
Floating-point processing power5.733 TFLOPS ×20.06016 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×28
TMUs176 ×216
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II
Length307 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz635 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s ×220.32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 5 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 20 Watt

R9 295X2 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

8600M GT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 295X2 and GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 295X2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 105 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 6 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 295X2 or GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.