ATI FireGL V7600 vs Radeon R9 295X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking304not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.20no data
Power efficiency3.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVesuviusR600
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)6 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816 ×2240
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt127 Watt
Texture fill rate179.2 ×27.200
Floating-point processing power5.733 TFLOPS ×20.288 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×212
TMUs176 ×212
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length307 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s ×251.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1210.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 6 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 127 Watt

R9 295X2 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7600, on the other hand, has 293.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 295X2 and FireGL V7600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 295X2 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
ATI FireGL V7600
FireGL V7600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 105 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 295X2 or FireGL V7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.