CMP 50HX vs Radeon R9 295X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking305not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.20no data
Power efficiency3.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVesuviusTU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816 ×23584
Core clock speedno data1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate179.2 ×2296.6
Floating-point processing power5.733 TFLOPS ×211.07 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×280
TMUs176 ×2192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache704 KB3.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Length307 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×210 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2320 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s ×2560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 250 Watt

CMP 50HX has an age advantage of 7 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 295X2 and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 295X2 is a desktop graphics card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 105 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 77 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 295X2 or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.