Arctic Sound 1T vs Radeon R9 295X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking301not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.22no data
Power efficiency3.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameVesuviusArctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (12 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816 ×26144
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate179.2 ×2172.8
Floating-point processing power5.733 TFLOPS ×211.06 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×296
TMUs176 ×2192
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length307 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×216 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×24096 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s ×21.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 350 Watt

Arctic Sound 1T has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 43% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 295X2 and Arctic Sound 1T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 295X2 is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound 1T is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 106 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate Arctic Sound 1T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 295X2 or Arctic Sound 1T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.