Radeon HD 8310E vs R9 290X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.49
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameHawaiiKalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 June 2014 (11 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816 ×2128
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate176.0 ×22.400
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPS ×20.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×24
TMUs176 ×28
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 June 2014 23 April 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 25 Watt

R9 290X2 has an age advantage of 1 year.

HD 8310E, on the other hand, has 2220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290X2 and Radeon HD 8310E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8310E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2
AMD Radeon HD 8310E
Radeon HD 8310E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290X2 or Radeon HD 8310E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.