GRID K260Q vs Radeon R9 290X2
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 581 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.38 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.39 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | Hawaii | GK104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 June 2014 (11 years ago) | 28 June 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | $937 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2816 ×2 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 6,200 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 580 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 176.0 ×2 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.632 TFLOPS ×2 | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 176 ×2 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | 3-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 4x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB ×2 | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit ×2 | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 345.6 GB/s ×2 | 160.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | - | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 June 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 580 Watt | 225 Watt |
R9 290X2 has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GRID K260Q, on the other hand, has 157.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290X2 and GRID K260Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop graphics card while GRID K260Q is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
