ATI FireGL V7300 vs Radeon R9 290X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameHawaiiR520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 June 2014 (11 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 $1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816 ×2no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt97 Watt
Texture fill rate176.0 ×29.504
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×216
TMUs176 ×216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz648 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×241.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 June 2014 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 97 Watt

R9 290X2 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7300, on the other hand, has 497.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290X2 and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2
ATI FireGL V7300
FireGL V7300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290X2 or FireGL V7300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.