A800 SXM4 80 GB vs Radeon R9 290X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameHawaiiGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 June 2014 (10 years ago)11 August 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28166912
Core clock speed1000 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate176.0609.1
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs64160
TMUs176432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width3-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB80 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 June 2014 11 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 400 Watt

A800 SXM4 80 GB has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 45% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290X2 and A800 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop card while A800 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2
NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB
A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate A800 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.