GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking344not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.06no data
Power efficiency4.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameHawaiiGK104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 October 2013 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161536
Core clock speedno data719 MHz
Boost clock speed947 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate176.092.03
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPS2.209 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs176128
L1 Cache704 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 October 2013 23 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 122 Watt

R9 290X has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 680MX Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 104.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290X and GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 511 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290X or GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.