ATI FirePro V3750 vs Radeon R9 290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking287not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.83no data
Power efficiency4.87no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameHawaiiRV730
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 October 2013 (10 years ago)11 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816320
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Boost clock speed947 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate176.017.60
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPS0.352 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs17632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length275 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1210.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 October 2013 11 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 48 Watt

R9 290X has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V3750, on the other hand, has 420.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290X and FirePro V3750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X is a desktop card while FirePro V3750 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
ATI FirePro V3750
FirePro V3750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 442 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.