Quadro 6000 SDI vs Radeon R9 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking318not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.03no data
Power efficiency5.42no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameHawaiiGF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 November 2013 (12 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $11,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560448
Core clock speed947 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt231 Watt
Texture fill rate151.532.14
Floating-point processing power4.849 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs16056
L1 Cache640 KB896 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length275 mm248 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 November 2013 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 231 Watt

R9 290 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

6000 SDI, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 19% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290 and Quadro 6000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 6000 SDI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 625 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 10 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290 or Quadro 6000 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.