GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon R9 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 290 with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 290
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 275 Watt
19.11

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms R9 290 by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29941
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.95no data
Power efficiency5.2972.25
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameHawaiiGB205
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 November 2013 (11 years ago)March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25605888
Core clock speed947 MHz847 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1447 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate151.5266.2
Floating-point processing power4.849 TFLOPS17.04 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs160184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 290 19.11
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 56.93
+198%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 290 8093
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 24114
+198%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 290 11860
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 44604
+276%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−228%
131
+228%
1440p27−30
−215%
85
+215%
4K18−21
−239%
61
+239%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.98no data
1440p14.78no data
4K22.17no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 316
+0%
316
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 244
+0%
244
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+0%
164
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how R9 290 and RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 228% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 215% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 239% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.11 56.93
Recency 5 November 2013 on March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 197.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 358.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 290 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 600 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 143 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.