Tesla K40d vs Radeon R9 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking368not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.68no data
Power efficiency6.47no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTongaGK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 September 2014 (11 years ago)22 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $7,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922880
Core clock speed918 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate102.8210.2
Floating-point processing power3.29 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs112240
L1 Cache448 KB240 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length221 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 245 Watt

R9 285 has an age advantage of 9 months, and 28.9% lower power consumption.

Tesla K40d, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 285 and Tesla K40d. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 285 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K40d is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 285
Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA Tesla K40d
Tesla K40d

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla K40d on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 285 or Tesla K40d, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.