Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 285
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 368 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.68 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.47 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Tonga | G80 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 September 2014 (11 years ago) | 5 March 2007 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $2,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 918 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 681 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 171 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 102.8 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.29 TFLOPS | 0.3686 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 24 |
| TMUs | 112 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 96 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 312 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 176.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 September 2014 | 5 March 2007 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 171 Watt |
R9 285 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.
FX 5600 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 11% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 285 and Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 285 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
