GeForce FX 5900 XT vs Radeon R9 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking366not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.57no data
Power efficiency6.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameTongaNV35
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 September 2014 (11 years ago)12 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed918 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate102.83.200
Floating-point processing power3.29 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1128
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0a
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 12 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 35 Watt

R9 285 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has 442.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 285 and GeForce FX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 285
Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
GeForce FX 5900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 20 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 285 or GeForce FX 5900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.