Xe DG1 vs Radeon R9 280X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameTahitiDG1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×2640
Core clock speed950 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0 ×262.00
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS ×21.984 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×220
TMUs128 ×240
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length315 mm164 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s ×268.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.21x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 30 Watt

Xe DG1 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X2 and Xe DG1. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X2
Radeon R9 280X2
Intel Xe DG1
Xe DG1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 33 votes

Rate Xe DG1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280X2 or Xe DG1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.