Radeon RX Vega 2 vs R9 280X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data7 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×2128
Core clock speed950 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×2no data
TMUs128 ×2no data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length315 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)no data
Vulkan1.2.170-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 2 has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X2 and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 2 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X2
Radeon R9 280X2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 2
Radeon RX Vega 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 252 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280X2 or Radeon RX Vega 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.