Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics vs R9 280X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTahitiBeema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data23 February 2016 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×264
Core clock speed950 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0 ×23.976
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS ×20.06362 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×24
TMUs128 ×28
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length315 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)2.1
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 15 Watt

R1E Mobile Graphics has 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X2 and Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280X2 or Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.