Arctic Sound-M vs Radeon R9 280X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTahitiArctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×28192
Core clock speed950 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0 ×2230.4
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS ×214.75 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×2128
TMUs128 ×2256
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length315 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×216 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×24096 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s ×21.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 500 Watt

R9 280X2 has 33% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 433% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X2 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X2 is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280X2 or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.