Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Aggregated performance score

GTX 780 Ti
2013
3072 MB GDDR5
24.57
+71.1%

GeForce GTX 780 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 280 by 71% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking204333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.0910.99
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK110Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date7 November 2013 (10 years old)4 March 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $279
Current price$461 (0.7x MSRP)$91 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 280 has 116% better value for money than GTX 780 Ti.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28801792
CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed875 MHzno data
Boost clock speed928 MHz933 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate210 billion/sec104.5
Floating-point performance5,345 gflops3,344 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)275 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsOne 8-pin and one 6-pin1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB3 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s240 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
Eyefinityno data1
HDMI++
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
DisplayPort supportno data-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
CrossFireno data1
Endurono data-
FreeSyncno data1
HD3Dno data+
LiquidVRno data1
PowerTuneno data-
TressFXno data1
TrueAudiono data+
ZeroCoreno data-
UVDno data+
DDMA audiono data+
Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
Mantleno data-
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 Ti 24.57
+71.1%
R9 280 14.36

GeForce GTX 780 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 280 by 71% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 780 Ti 9516
+71.1%
R9 280 5562

GeForce GTX 780 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 280 by 71% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780 Ti 11812
+47.3%
R9 280 8020

GeForce GTX 780 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 280 by 47% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+77.8%
45−50
−77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
Hitman 3 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+77.8%
45−50
−77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
Hitman 3 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+77.8%
45−50
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Hitman 3 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Hitman 3 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

This is how GTX 780 Ti and R9 280 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 780 Ti is 74.5% faster than R9 280

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 24.57 14.36
Recency 7 November 2013 4 March 2014
Cost $699 $279
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 280 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
AMD Radeon R9 280
Radeon R9 280

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 624 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 374 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R9 280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.