Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs R9 270X

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking364not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.49no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCuracao XTVega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)1 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$136 (0.7x MSRP)$299

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804096
Core clock speedno data1156 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate84.00319.2
Floating-point performance2,688 gflops10,215 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pin2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s409.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+no data
Mantle-no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 8 October 2013 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 270X and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 701 vote

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.