GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon R9 270X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 270X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
12.64

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 270X by an impressive 98% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking367198
Place by popularitynot in top-10063
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.55no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameCuracao XTGN20-P1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)10 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$136 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802560
Core clock speedno data1222 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate84.00118.8
Floating-point performance2,688 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 270X and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270X 12.64
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 25.00
+97.8%

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 270X by 98% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 270X 6560
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360
+104%

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 270X by 104% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−109%
73
+109%
1440p21−24
−105%
43
+105%
4K14−16
−100%
28
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−210%
62
+210%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−200%
60
+200%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−100%
80−85
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−195%
59
+195%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−94.3%
65−70
+94.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−86%
80−85
+86%
Hitman 3 27−30
−262%
105
+262%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−251%
144
+251%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−276%
143
+276%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−180%
98
+180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−266%
128
+266%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−157%
59
+157%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−75%
35
+75%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−100%
80−85
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−125%
45
+125%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−114%
75
+114%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−17.1%
41
+17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−86%
80−85
+86%
Hitman 3 27−30
−124%
65
+124%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−200%
123
+200%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−116%
82
+116%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−157%
90
+157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−149%
87
+149%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−254%
92
+254%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−139%
55
+139%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−30%
26
+30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−100%
40
+100%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−86%
80−85
+86%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−124%
92
+124%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−92.1%
73
+92.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−92.3%
50
+92.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−21.7%
28
+21.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−131%
81
+131%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−92%
45−50
+92%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−264%
80
+264%
Hitman 3 18−20
−139%
43
+139%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−189%
26
+189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−86.7%
28
+86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−267%
22
+267%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−150%
50
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−165%
69
+165%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−186%
60
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−190%
61
+190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−186%
20
+186%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 27−30
−89.3%
53
+89.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−292%
47
+292%
Hitman 3 9−10
−122%
20
+122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−123%
27−30
+123%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−171%
19
+171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−164%
29
+164%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−217%
38
+217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−162%
34
+162%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−133%
28
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−100%
10
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−142%
29
+142%

This is how R9 270X and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 109% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 105% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 400% faster than the R9 270X.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3050 Ti Mobile surpassed R9 270X in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.64 25.00
Recency 8 October 2013 10 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 60 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 270X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 270X is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 707 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3895 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.