Quadro 3000M X2 vs Radeon R9 270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking469not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.22no data
Power efficiency5.22no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameCuracaoEXMF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 November 2013 (11 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280240 ×2
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate74.0018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power2.368 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs8040 ×2
L1 Cache320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data625 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2013 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R9 270 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 270 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 270 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 657 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 270 or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.