GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs Radeon R9 270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking477not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.38no data
Power efficiency5.26no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCuracaoGT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 November 2013 (11 years ago)16 February 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280240
Core clock speedno data633 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt219 Watt
Texture fill rate74.0050.64
Floating-point processing power2.368 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs3228
TMUs8080
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length210 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB896 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s127.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2013 16 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 219 Watt

R9 270 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 270 and GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 659 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 270 or GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.