Tegra 4i GPU vs Radeon R9 260 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameBonaireTegra 4
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 December 2013 (12 years ago)19 February 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz660 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million11 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate61.601.320
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs562
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length183 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1625 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth104.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6ES 3.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 19 February 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 20 Watt

R9 260 OEM has an age advantage of 10 months.

Tegra 4i GPU, on the other hand, has 325% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 260 OEM and Tegra 4i GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 260 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Tegra 4i GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Radeon R9 260 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4i GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 260 OEM or Tegra 4i GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.