AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
General info
Technical specs
Memory
Mining
Conclusion
Cast your vote
User rating
Advices and comments
General info
Comparison of Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
not rated
not rated
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 5.0
Code name
Cape Verde
Vega 10
Type
Desktop
Desktop
Release date
21 December 2013
7 August 2017
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$699
Price now
no data
$246
Technical specs
Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
512
4096
Core clock speed
900 MHz
1408 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1668 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
345 Watt
Texture fill rate
29.76
427.0
Floating-point performance
952.3 gflops
14,336 gflops
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Length
no data
282 mm
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
2x 8-pin
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
8 GB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
2048 Bit
Memory clock speed
4600 MHz
1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
483.8 GB/s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI
-
+
API support
APIs supported by Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.125
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
no data
33.1 Mh/s
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Less power hungry (65 vs 345 watts)
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Much newer (7 August 2017 vs 21 December 2013)
Wider memory bus (2048 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (4096 vs 512)
Higher memory bandwidth (483.8 vs 73.6 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
So, R9 255 OEM or RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
Like
Like
