Radeon RX 5300 vs R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.84
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameCape VerdeNavi 14
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 December 2013 (11 years ago)28 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121408
Core clock speed900 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate29.76144.8
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3288
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data180 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 28 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

R9 255 OEM has 53.8% lower power consumption.

RX 5300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon RX 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1068 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 44 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or Radeon RX 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.