Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCape VerdeVega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date21 December 2013 (12 years ago)19 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123072
Core clock speed900 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate29.76249.6
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32192
L1 Cache128 KB768 KB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz786 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s402.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Pro Vega 48 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon Pro Vega 48. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1069 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 78 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or Radeon Pro Vega 48, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.