ATI Radeon 9700 vs R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.27
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameCape VerdeR300
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 December 2013 (11 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed900 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate29.762.200
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz270 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s17.28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 37 Watt

R9 255 OEM has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9700, on the other hand, has 75.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon 9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM
ATI Radeon 9700
Radeon 9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1067 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or Radeon 9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.