HD Graphics 10EU Mobile vs Radeon R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameCape VerdeHaswell GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 December 2013 (12 years ago)29 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51280
Core clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate29.768.500
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS0.136 TFLOPS
ROPs161
TMUs3210
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1150 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 29 April 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

R9 255 OEM has an age advantage of 7 months.

HD Graphics 10EU Mobile, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and HD Graphics 10EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics 10EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM
Intel HD Graphics 10EU Mobile
HD Graphics 10EU Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1069 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate HD Graphics 10EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or HD Graphics 10EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.