GeForce GT 555M 3 GB vs Radeon R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGF106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 December 2013 (11 years ago)24 March 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512144
Core clock speed900 MHz590 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate29.7614.16
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS0.3398 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs3224
L1 Cache128 KB192 KB
L2 Cache256 KB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s43.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 24 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

R9 255 OEM has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 555M 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and GeForce GT 555M 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 555M 3 GB is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M 3 GB
GeForce GT 555M 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1068 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 11 votes

Rate GeForce GT 555M 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or GeForce GT 555M 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.