GRID M6-8Q vs Radeon R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.57
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 December 2013 (12 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121536
Core clock speed900 MHz722 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate29.7669.31
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs3296
L1 Cache128 KB576 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

R9 255 OEM has 54% lower power consumption.

GRID M6-8Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and GRID M6-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GRID M6-8Q is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1069 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or GRID M6-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.