Arctic Sound 2T vs Radeon R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameCape VerdeArctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 December 2013 (12 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5127680 ×2
Core clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate29.76216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs16120 ×2
TMUs32240 ×2
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s1.23 TB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 500 Watt

R9 255 OEM has 669.2% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1069 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.