ATI Graphics Ultra + vs Radeon R8 M445DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking943not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameMesoMach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)1 January 1992 (33 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed780 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Texture fill rate20.42no data
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs20no data
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)None
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.0None
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 1 January 1992
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

R8 M445DX has an age advantage of 24 years, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M445DX and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M445DX is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon R8 M445DX
ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 86 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M445DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M445DX or Graphics Ultra +, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.