GMA 3150 vs Radeon R8 M445DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9511598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameMesoPineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed780 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rate20.420.8
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs202
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c
Shader Model6.03.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R8 M445DX 796
+39700%
Samples: 30
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Fortnite 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 23 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Fortnite 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 6 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 21 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
Valorant 12−14 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 9−10 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

R8 M445DX has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 61% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M445DX and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 87 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M445DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 180 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M445DX or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.