HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs R8 M365DX

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

R8 M365DX
1.55

HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms R8 M365DX by 31% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking922835
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameMesono data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2015 (8 years old)15 May 2012 (11 years old)
Current priceno data$90

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768862
Core clock speed720 / 1125 MHz685 / 600 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Texture fill rate27.00no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R8 M365DX and Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceIGPno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3,GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus width128 + 64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 / 1000 MHz1800 MHz
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R8 M365DX 1.55
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 2.03
+31%

HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms R8 M365DX by 31% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R8 M365DX 6992
+7.1%
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 6528

R8 M365DX outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by 7% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R8 M365DX 2863
+35.5%
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 2112

R8 M365DX outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by 36% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R8 M365DX 1902
+117%
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 875

R8 M365DX outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by 117% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R8 M365DX 11291
+70.2%
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 6635

R8 M365DX outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by 70% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−28.6%
18
+28.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how R8 M365DX and HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 28.6% faster than R8 M365DX

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R8 M365DX is 40% faster than the HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 200% faster than the R8 M365DX.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R8 M365DX is ahead in 1 test (3%)
  • HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is ahead in 25 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (26%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.55 2.03
Recency 3 June 2015 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R8 M365DX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Radeon R8 M365DX
AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 8 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R8 M365DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 55 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 7660G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.