ATI Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs R8 M365DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1006not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMesoRS880
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2015 (10 years ago)1 March 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38440
Core clock speed900 MHz498 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz560 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Texture fill rate27.002.240
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs244
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.04.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2015 1 March 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

R8 M365DX has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M365DX and Radeon HD 4250 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M365DX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4250 IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Radeon R8 M365DX
ATI Radeon HD 4250 IGP
Radeon HD 4250 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M365DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M365DX or Radeon HD 4250 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.