A100 SXM4 vs Radeon R8 M365DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1000not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMesoGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2015 (10 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846912
Core clock speed900 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00609.1
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs24432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache96 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2E
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared40 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,555 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2015 14 May 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M365DX and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M365DX is a notebook graphics card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Radeon R8 M365DX
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M365DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M365DX or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.