FirePro M3900 vs Radeon R7 M465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking865not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTopazSeymour
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384160
Core clock speed1100 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rate27.006.000
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache96 KB16 KB
L2 Cache128 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 19 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R7 M465 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M465 and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M465 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M465
Radeon R7 M465
AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M465 or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.