Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Radeon R7 M445

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking831not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.76no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameMesoAlder Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320640
Core clock speed780 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed920 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4052.00
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS1.664 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs2040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

R7 M445 has 200% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M445 and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M445 is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 119 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 156 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.