GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs Radeon R7 M445
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 799 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.11 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Meso | GP108 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 May 2016 (7 years ago) | 12 March 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $79 |
| Current price | $809 | $404 (5.1x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1152 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 920 MHz | 1379 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 33.10 |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 1,059 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R7 M445 and GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 16.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| HDMI | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 6.1 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 15 May 2016 | 12 March 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M445 and GeForce GT 1030 DDR4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M445 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
