GeForce 405M vs Radeon R7 M445

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking906not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.98no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameMesoGT218
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)5 January 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed780 MHz606 MHz
Boost clock speed920 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate18.404.848
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS0.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs84
TMUs208
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.04.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 14 Watt

R7 M445 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 405M, on the other hand, has 7.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M445 and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 122 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M445 or GeForce 405M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.