GMA 3650 vs Radeon R7 M445

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking836not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.81no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameMesoCedarview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32032
Core clock speed780 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed920 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate18.402.560
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS0.04096 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1
Shader Model6.04.1
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

R7 M445 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3650, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M445 and GMA 3650. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
Intel GMA 3650
GMA 3650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 119 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GMA 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.