ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T vs Radeon R7 M445

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking904not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.98no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameMesoR360
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed780 MHz412 MHz
Boost clock speed920 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate18.403.296
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs208
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz344 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s22.02 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R7 M445 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M445 and FireGL 9800 X2-256T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M445 is a notebook graphics card while FireGL 9800 X2-256T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T
FireGL 9800 X2-256T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 122 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M445 or FireGL 9800 X2-256T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.