RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon R7 M365

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated82
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data36.37
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLithoAD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed900 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed960 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04247.2
Floating-point processing powerno data15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 7 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M365 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M365 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M365 or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.