Radeon HD 8670A vs R7 M360

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	944	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	no data
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Meso	Sun
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 May 2015 (9 years ago)	2 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	$879	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	320
Compute units	6	no data
Core clock speed	1125 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1125 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,550 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	27.00	12.00
Floating-point performance	864.0 gflops	384.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M360 and Radeon HD 8670A compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	no data	MXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	16 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
Mantle	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	6 May 2015	2 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---