ATI Mobility FireGL 9000 vs Radeon R7 M340

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking933not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameMesoM9
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3205
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed943 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate20.421.000
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.1
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R7 M340 has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M340 and Mobility FireGL 9000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M340 is a notebook graphics card while Mobility FireGL 9000 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M340
Radeon R7 M340
ATI Mobility FireGL 9000
Mobility FireGL 9000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 316 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.