GeForce2 MX 200 PCI vs Radeon R7 M340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking999not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameMesoNV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)3 March 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed943 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate20.420.7
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs204
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s1.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 127.0
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R7 M340 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M340 and GeForce2 MX 200 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M340 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX 200 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M340
Radeon R7 M340
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 PCI
GeForce2 MX 200 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 350 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M340 or GeForce2 MX 200 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.